Kagan wins first case in Supreme Court - guess what it's about by Jay Knott (06/22/10) ⇌ (Israel and the US)
The new Supreme, Elena Kagan, has won a case making it illegal to give advice, including legal assistance and information on conflict resolution, to groups designated 'terrorist'. So Hillary Clinton's heroic intervention to resolve the conflict in Northern Ireland could get her locked up.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2010/jun/21/nonviolent-aid-banned-groups-terrorism
Of course, it would be anti-semitic to mention Elena Kagan's ethnicity.
The Supreme Court still defends the interests of the white male slaveowners who founded it.
It's not just aimed at preventing American citizens giving non-violent aid to Israel's opponents.
After all, the ruling prohibits giving advice to the Khmer Rouge as well as Hamas.
No doubt many Americans were about to give advice on conflict resolution to the Khmer Rouge.
Comments
|
Just when I thought I was too obsessive about Kagan and the J-question
(06/29/10)
by Jay Knott:
Every time I come out with one of these outbursts against Jewish racist influence in the higher circles of American society, I ask myself "have I gone too far?". Once again, the answer is no.
Before Kagan, I never took any...
|
|
The Supreme Court has not gone completely ZIonist
(06/28/10)
by Jay Knott:
The court has ruled that Americans can still carry guns for self-defence:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100628/ap_on_go_su_co/us_supreme_court_guns
...
|
|
Talking Turkey
(06/26/10)
by Jay Knott:
Ironically, the test case which led to this setback to freedom and peace was about an American talking to Kurdish separatists, not Palestinians. Elena Kagan and other powerful Zionists chose to criminalize talking about peace to...
|
|
More about the Supreme Court decision
(06/26/10)
by Jay Knott:
http://www.israel-palestinenews.org/2010/06/kagan-argued-for-supreme-court-decision.html |